On Oct 11, 2008, at 7:25 AM, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
> It is correct to say, though, that:
>
> function foo() {
> ...
> { var bar = baz; }
> ...
> }
>
> is equivalent to
>
> function foo() {
> let bar = undefined;
> ...
> { bar = baz; }
> ...
> }
>
> That is, 'var' need not be primitive. Only 'let' needs to be
> primitive.
Indeed.
> Similarly, if we are careful in specifying 'lambda' then 'function'
> need
> not be primitive, since it will be expressible as a rewrite to
> 'lambda'.
Yes, this is called out already in
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:lambdas
/be
_______________________________________________
Es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
