On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's more, as discussed here and in TC39, repeated let declarations for
> the same binding name within the same block should be allowed. Anything else
> is user- and refactoring-hostile. So the non-initial let declarations for a
> given name in the same block would be ignored.
What if repeated let declarations constrain the same variable with
different type-annotation-constraints?
If we want to avoid the read-barrier, we should not hoist either const
or let. If we are to consider not hoisting const, WE NEED TO DECIDE
THIS NOW, before ES3.1 mandates a hoisting const.
--
Cheers,
--MarkM
_______________________________________________
Es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
