2008/12/4 Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Sam pointed that out too, and directed everyone to his test-implementation > results page: > http://intertwingly.net/stories/2008/09/20/estest.html > Indeed we still have an open issue there ignoring the wrapper one: > > I think the only major outstanding semantic issue was wrapper > objects; apart from that, the devil was in the detail of spec wording. > > No, the cohort/toString issue remains too (at least).
With a longer schedule, I would like to revisit that; but as of Redmond, we had consensus on what that would look like in the context of a 3.1 edition. >From where I sit, I find myself in the frankly surreal position that we are in early December, and there are no known issues of consensus, though I respect that David-Sarah claims that there is one on wrappers, and I await his providing of more detail. > /be - Sam Ruby _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list Es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
