>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark S. Miller [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:27 AM
...
>See again the language I propose for sort. While leaving the choice of
>sorting algorithm unspecified, I place bounds on the range of side
>effects it may cause even under uncooperative conditions. If we really
>wish to leave the precise algorithm unspecified for these others, the
>same qualifying language could still be applied.
>

The only thing that I see in the language in your previous message that may not 
be already covered is "[if any of the [[Get]], [[Put]], or [[Delete]] 
operations fail,] the only side effects sort would cause would be that brought 
about by calling these other operations."

Personally, I think this concept is already implicit in the sort algorithm and 
most other algorithms in the specification. However, I wouldn't mind making it 
explicit for the other array methods if we could also made it explicit that 
implementation may use alternative algorithms that apply [Get]], [[Put]], or 
[[Delete]] in possibly different orderings.

Here is my first cut at a generic version of language that might accomplish 
that:

The above algorithm is intended to describe the result produced by this 
function in the absence of any error conditions. It is not intended to imply 
the use of any specific implementation technique. The above algorithm produces 
its results by using a specific sequence of calls to internal methods and 
abstract operations.  Implementation may use other algorithms that use a 
different sequencing of these calls as long as an identical results is obtained 
in the absence of errors conditions. If any internal method call invokes a get 
or set function of an accessor property that has side-effects or if an error 
occurs the observable side-effects of this function are implementation defined 
but are restricted to those that would be produced by some sequence of the 
internal method and abstract operation calls in the above algorithm.

Allen
_______________________________________________
Es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to