I apologize if this double posts, my other mail client seems a bit finicky.
P T Withington wrote:
> Assuming we're allowed to speculate on futures here...
>
> I was thinking about improving debug-ability by adding descriptive names
to function expressions thusly,
>
> var myFun = function "my description here" (...) { ... };
>
>I.e., be able to use an arbitrary string as the "name" of a function
expression. It seems to me this would be an unambiguous extension, only
giving up an unlikely syntax error. >No runtime is required to do anything
with the name, although it would be encouraged to make it available as the
.name property of the function object. Comments?
>From what I understand arguments.callee is going away. If that is the case,
then from within that function how would I call it?
function "my description here" () {
...
"my description here"(foo)
};
That doesn't seem right, but maybe I'm overlooking something.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
