Just have remembered that Python has doc string, so it's not actually a comment. Is the problem about using comment for such purposes in parsing procedure? (that it ignores whitespace and comment tokens)
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Dan Tsimbala <[email protected]> wrote: > On the other hand, this is also just using one syntactic feature (string >> literal) for another purpose: a special type of comment. >> > > So why not do it as the first comment of the function, like Python does. > String literal seems strange. But in any case I like this idea more than > descriptive names. > > The only problem for me is that it might overlap with for example JSDoc > comments, and with string literal you can't do anything about it. >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
