On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 13:46, Mark Miller<[email protected]> wrote: > As I think Allen first suggested (please correct if I misattribute or > misconstrue), I have been using "Harmony" to label the trajectory that the > Harmony agreement set us on. I have been using "ES6" to name whatever the > next concrete spec edition will be that emerges from our agreed trajectory. > No matter how fast or slow ES6 is, many of the things currently hoped for > under the Harmony banner will not make it into the next concrete edition.
I want to second that. The list of features we agreed on at the last F2F was a bit too long for my liking. I think it is more reasonable to do the new spec (with a RI) and just add a few of those features in a faster iteration. I have my opinion on which those features are but l would rather save that discussion for the next face to face meeting. -- erik _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
