Yep. I thought ModuleInstanceGroup was a little over the top. :) Dave
On Feb 3, 2010, at 3:30 PM, [email protected] wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:11 AM, David Herman <[email protected]> wrote: >> How about "module group"? > > But it's not a group of modules; it's a group of their instances (or > whatever you want to call them -- the extension of the types in the > modules). > > Ihab > > -- > Ihab A.B. Awad, Palo Alto, CA _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
