On May 13, 2010, at 4:57 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote: > I'm surprised no one has said this yet but here goes: > > ArrayBuffer needs to extend Array. In other words instances of > ArrayBuffer needs to also be instances of Array
I don't believe ArrayBuffer behaves like a superset of Array at all. It is intended to be an opaque type whose data is not accessible except via "views" into a range of the buffer (possibly the entire buffer). But I can understand your concern about the naming, which can of course be changed. _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
