On Jul 24, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > On Jul 24, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Alex Russell wrote: > >> I think the plan was to allow for "return" in # functions. Again, we went >> around on this point a couple of times and I may be wrong to want >> auto-return. Frankly, I'd settle for a shorter name for "return" ;-) > > Propose one? The completion value hazard is going to be a stumbling block in > TC39, I would bet real money (andnot due to me).
Of course dherman already proposed explicit "result here" syntax: => expr. See http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:let_expressions But these were deferred. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
