On Jul 25, 2010, at 4:57 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > Perhaps the strawman page for shorter function syntax should list reasons for > rejecting other syntax options. I would be happy to document the reasons > against fn, fun, f and \, but I can't seem to remember my username and > password (I'm not even sure if I have an account). Who can help with wiki > access issues?
I documented the alternate proposals and known problems if any here: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:shorter_function_syntax#alternate_syntax_proposals For the Ruby-like syntax, I was not sure what the zero-argument case would look like. Would it be like this: [0, 1, 2, 3].map({|| x * x}) Or like this: [0, 1, 2, 3].map({x * x}) The former looks ugly to me and the latter may create parser difficulties. Regards, Maciej _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
