On 7 Sep 2010, at 17:18, P T Withington wrote:
> On 2010-09-07, at 12:02, Brendan Eich wrote:
> 
>> 3. identical
> 
> If I had a vote, +1
> 
> Is there someplace that concisely explains the cost of just fixing `===` so I 
> could understand why that is not a choice?
> 

FWIW this sort of naming issue is a rabbit hole that CommonJS fell down when it 
came to method names for a unit test framework[0]. There was no real consensus, 
but we settled on equal meaning == and strictEqual meaning ===. 

-ash

[0]: http://wiki.commonjs.org/wiki/Unit_Testing/1.0
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to