On 2010-12-23 23:51, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: > I believe that your "camp" wants to think of soft fields, stored in a > side-table, as extensions of an object. My "camp" thinks of such > side-tables as a means of recording information about an object without > actually extending the object.
These are obviously alternative views of the same thing -- as MarkM and I have made clear throughout. It really doesn't matter whether you view the object has having been "extended" or not, if that is semantically unobservable. (And I don't like people trying to tell me what "camp" I'm in, thankyou.) -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ http://davidsarah.livejournal.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
