>> I'm not sure how this would be done best or how useful it would be, but: has >> dependency injection been considered as a use case for modules (e.g. to swap >> modules during testing)? >> >> One possibility might be to give modules parameters that module clients have >> to provide.
> The module system was designed to make it as easy as possible to use, both > for general ease of use and to encourage modular programming. Once you move > to an approach where programmers have to write their own linking > specifications, it tends to get much more complicated. When you make modules > more complicated to use, people don't use them. Yes, I’m all for simplicity. > Module loaders do give you the ability to do dependency injection, though, by > changing the semantics of module URL's. Right. This should give one everything one needs. -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer [email protected] twitter.com/rauschma home: rauschma.de blog: 2ality.com _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
