Or that was what I intended in rewriting the earlier proposal. Thanks to Mark for fixing whatever was broken.
/be On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Bob Nystrom wrote: > >> Either I'm out-of-date or the wiki page is. My understanding is that at the >> TC39 meetings we decided to move instance and private record declarations >> out of the class body and into the constructor. If that's the case, this >> should be less confusing. You can no longer use "public" or "private" at the >> class body level. So that example becomes: > > Yes, the proposal puts instance property/variable declarations in the > constructor body. > > No, it does not outlaw private and even public for class body elements that > define (without static or whatever we use instead of static) prototype > properties. > > /be > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
