On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote:
> Or that was what I intended in rewriting the earlier proposal. Thanks to > Mark for fixing whatever was broken. > I haven't fixed it yet. Stay tuned. > > /be > > On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > > > On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Bob Nystrom wrote: > > > >> Either I'm out-of-date or the wiki page is. My understanding is that at > the TC39 meetings we decided to move instance and private record > declarations out of the class body and into the constructor. If that's the > case, this should be less confusing. You can no longer use "public" or > "private" at the class body level. So that example becomes: > > > > Yes, the proposal puts instance property/variable declarations in the > constructor body. > > > > No, it does not outlaw private and even public for class body elements > that define (without static or whatever we use instead of static) prototype > properties. > > > > /be > > > > _______________________________________________ > > es-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
