Is it possible to share the example code? On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:18 PM, John J Barton <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Oct 10, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Bob Nystrom wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Dean Landolt <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> Here's an example: >>> >>>> >>>> let tree = [['a', 'b', 'c'], [['d', 'e'], 'f'], ['g']]; >>>> >>>> let inOrder = walk(tree); >>>> for (node of walk(tree)) alert(node); // a, b, c, d, ... >>>> >>>> walk(tree) { >>>> if (typeof tree == 'string') { >>>> yield tree; // leaf >>>> } else { >>>> yield* walk(tree); // branch >>>> } >>>> } >>>> >>>> >>>> What would the above look like without generators? >>>> >>> >>> >>> Woah there -- where does this syntax come from? Was `walk(tree) {...}` >>> supposed to be `function* walk(tree) {...}` instead? Or is this intended to >>> represent some sort of method generator? If the latter, doesn't this need >>> some mechanism to distinguish it from a non-generator method? >>> >> >> Whoops, my mistake. Too much time working on the class proposal where >> "function" isn't needed for methods. >> >> >> I spy a Dart ;-). >> >> >> Yes, that should be function*. >> >> >> Still a great delegated generator example. Thanks, >> > > Bob sent me a more complete and much more convincing example off line. It > was more convincing because he had three different algorithms use the same > iterator. Did not convert me but I am at least moved out of the "no way" > column. > > jjb > >> >> /be >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
