On Oct 26, 2011, at 5:02 PM, Michael Dyck wrote: >>> (I ask because, in my spare time, I'm developing a process that massages >>> the ES spec into an executable/testable form. So I wonder if I'm >>> duplicating existing work.) >> Interesting -- you are writing an interpreter? > > Yes, but not an interpreter for ES, rather an interpreter (more or less) > for ES-spec-ese, the ad hoc notation that the ES spec's algorithms are > written in.
Right, our Visual Cobol, as it were ;-). > So then if you feed the ES spec to *that* interpreter, you > do get an interpreter for ES. That's the idea, anyhow. It works, but so > far only for really simple programs. This could indeed satisfy the goal! Great to hear you are working on it. How is it going? /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
