>>>> +1. Where the spec is already almost pseudo-code, its readability would >>>> improve if it was, in fact, pseudo-code. But would an extra interpreter be >>>> needed or couldn’t one just implement the ES-262 constructs (execution >>>> contexts etc.) in an existing language (Python, Rust, Scheme, Smalltalk, >>>> etc.)? >>> Why choosing a completely different language? Why not ECMAScript 5.1? >> >> Right, I had forgotten about ECMAScript itself. > > I would do it in ES5, or not at all. There is absolutely no need for any > other language. Always eat your own dogfood!
Why not ES6? Because it’s not finished, yet and you want to start now? -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer [email protected] home: rauschma.de twitter: twitter.com/rauschma blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
