+1 to me, this is far more intuitive than the current proposal.
-Mikeal On Oct 31, 2011, at October 31, 20116:57 PM, Jeremy Ashkenas wrote: > 'Evening, ES-Discuss. > > After poking a stick in the bees' nest this morning (apologies, Allen), and > in the spirit of loyal opposition, it's only fair that I throw my hat in the > ring. > > Here is a proposal for minimalist JavaScript classes that enable behavior > that JavaScripters today desire (as evidenced by libraries and languages > galore), without adding any new semantics beyond what already exists in ES3. > > https://gist.github.com/1329619 > > Let me know what you think, and feel free to fork. > > Cheers, > Jeremy Ashkenas > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
