On Oct 31, 2011, at 6:57 PM, Jeremy Ashkenas wrote: > 'Evening, ES-Discuss. > > After poking a stick in the bees' nest this morning (apologies, Allen), and > in the spirit of loyal opposition, it's only fair that I throw my hat in the > ring. > > Here is a proposal for minimalist JavaScript classes that enable behavior > that JavaScripters today desire (as evidenced by libraries and languages > galore), without adding any new semantics beyond what already exists in ES3. > > https://gist.github.com/1329619 > > Let me know what you think, and feel free to fork.
Thanks, I did fork, and I made a Rich Corinthian Leather version, for the reasons given in the comments. In brief, I contend that over-minimizing will please no one: class haters still gonna hate, while class lovers used to batteries-and-leather-included will find the bare sheet metal poky and painful. Love it or hate it, I'm ok either way :-P. But I do crave intelligent responses. /be
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
