I guess we just don't agree then, I find this alternative very unintuitive.
On Nov 2, 2011, at November 2, 20112:02 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 13:39, Mikeal Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > > var generateModelClass = function(columns) { > > > > > > var definition = {}; > > > > > > columns.forEach(function(col) { > > > definition['get' + col] = function() { > > > return this[col]; > > > }; > > > definition['set' + col] = function(value) { > > > return this[col] = value; > > > }; > > > }); > > > > > > return class definition; > > > > > > }; > > > > I feel like this is too strange to my liking. With something more along what > Brendan was suggesting the same could be done like this: > > > var generateModelClass = function(columns) { > > > var c = class {}, > > > p = returnClass.prototype; > > > > > > columns.forEach(function(col) { > > > p['get' + col] = function() { > > > return this[col]; > > > }; > > > p['set' + col] = function(value) { > > > return this[col] = value; > > > }; > > > }); > > > > > > return c; > > > }; > > > > -- > erik
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
