> Turns out anything we do here is a special form, at least for named classes. > So 'constructor' in the harmony:classes proposal still on the wiki (which is > not fully in Harmony)is not just a prototype method like any other. Therefore > I agree we could use 'new' instead.
That’s what I missed. But wouldn’t that change Allen’s `class` operator to something that performs David’s desugaring as a tranformation (from something that simply returns the value of property `constructor`)? -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer [email protected] home: rauschma.de twitter: twitter.com/rauschma blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
