On Nov 19, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote: >> Turns out anything we do here is a special form, at least for named classes. >> So 'constructor' in the harmony:classes proposal still on the wiki (which is >> not fully in Harmony)is not just a prototype method like any other. >> Therefore I agree we could use 'new' instead. > > That’s what I missed. But wouldn’t that change Allen’s `class` operator to > something that performs David’s desugaring as a tranformation (from something > that simply returns the value of property `constructor`)?
I'm not sure. The two proposals are independent so far. Harmonizing them could be helpful. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
