Brandon Benvie <mailto:[email protected]>
January 21, 2012 9:59 PM
Sorry to spam this thread but I wanted to get the relevent points in
up front:
'Actually, wait a minute -- I think I disagree with you here.
On what? Being past the deadline? Not rushing a de-jure standard before
we have synthesized the right semantics from relevant JS embeddings?
Spec the unofficial agreement, including the minimal(/maximal if it
exists) time constraints, and go from there. This is needed.
Why? What goes wrong if we go light on execution model one more time? I
think nothing.
But in fact we are going to get a little more into execution model in
ES6. How much remains to be seen. We discussed it at last week's meeting.
But this is not an all-or-nothing proposition, and I do not see the
do-or-die requirement. Reality is what it is. HTML5 captures a lot.
Node.js conforms. ES6 saying more doesn't alter these facts.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
