On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think we should change __proto__ unnecessarily from current
> implementations, including making it an accessor. Neither JSC nor
> SpiderMonkey does that.
>
> We do need the ability to delete it, so it should live on Object.prototype
> and be configurable.
>
> Ignoring the "don't gild the lily" (or "don't polish the turd") advice
> above, if we *do* reflect __proto__ as an accessor, then the same-frame
> problem still exists. Perhaps it can be solved by proxies, but why require
> that?
>
And what is the connection with proxies? I don't get it.
--
Cheers,
--MarkM
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
