On Jan 31, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>> Allen Wirfs-Brock <mailto:al...@wirfs-brock.com>
>> January 31, 2012 8:43 AM
>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:36 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>>> Let's see how easy it is to split the 'var' and 'let/const' cases...
>>
>> already done
>
> In the latest draft on the wiki? I thought I had downloaded that already.
>>> But you could make a twisted argument for an effect-ful 'let'
>>> initialization expression also being "useful" in this way. We mustn't go
>>> there.
>>
>> might be "useful", but it would break the scoping rules.
>
> No, I meant this:
>
> let i = 42, j = 3;
> for (let x = i *= j in {});
>
> No iterations, x not in scope after -- but i is 126 after. Do Not Want (the
> initialiser).
for the same effec:
let i = 42, j = 3;
for (let x in (i *= j ,{}));
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
