+1 had same thoughts when I wrote this: https://github.com/WebReflection/es6-collections
then I have realized older IE compatibility requires the usage of the string but I would have rather suggested del instead of remove so get, set, has, del ... all 3 chars, no problems with reserved keywords br On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Peter Michaux <[email protected]>wrote: > The Set proposal has a "delete" method. Old ECMAScript implementations > do not allow "delete" to appear as a bare method name like > set.delete('foo') and it is necessary to write the awkward > set['delete']('foo'). Because of this and knowing polyfills will be > written to support Set in older implementations, would it be better to > choose "remove" as the method name so that set.remove('foo') can be > written in the older implementations? I think this would save a lot of > unnecessary debugging for cross-browser programming. > > Peter > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
