On Feb 10, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Brendan Eich wrote: > "over-specifying", right? I am in favor of specifying __proto__ minimally in > Annex B. >> But, one thing I would like enshrined in the spec is that `"__proto__" in >> Object.create(null) === false`. > For sure!
The idea of a minimal specification sounds really encouraging. It seems there are a few really key points that everyone appears to be in complete agreement on – that the __proto__ property should be a member of the Object Prototype, that this should be the only mechanism available to change an object's prototype, and that it should be configurable. On Feb 10, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > I know of no implementations that reflect __proto__ as an accessor, WebKit is using an accessor in nightly builds. cheers, G.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
