Allen, that link brings me to the "About this wiki" page Rick
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Axel Rauschmayer <[email protected]> wrote: > The direction is wrong. It’s what I like most about <| – that it’s > graphical, intuitive and indicates a direction. > > Is there a list of symbols that have already been rejected? I still like > <| best (better than a word such as beget or proto), followed by <~ and <: > > On Mar 2, 2012, at 23:30 , Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: > > It was recently suggested to me that it is unlikely that we will ever > adopt -> as as function expression shorthand symbol and that this means we > could consider using that symbol sequence for other purposes. In > particular, it would be a reasonable and possibly less controversial > alternative to the <| symbol. I would have no objection to that switch and > have written the suggestion up at > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php#suggestion_to_replace_with > > Some examples of this usage of -> include: > > MyObject.prototype -> {a:1,b:2} > > appArrayBehavior->[0,1,2,3,4,5] > > let subclass = superclass -> function () {}; > > var p = newRegExpMethods -> /[a-m][3-7]/ > > > What do you think? Do you like -> better than <| ? Is it ok to not have > it available for some possible future function shorthand? > > Allen > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > -- > Dr. Axel Rauschmayer > [email protected] > > home: rauschma.de > twitter: twitter.com/rauschma > blog: 2ality.com > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
