Sorry, I actually meant to ask a question: Isn’t the direction of -> wrong?
>> It was recently suggested to me that it is unlikely that we will ever adopt >> -> as as function expression shorthand symbol and that this means we could >> consider using that symbol sequence for other purposes. In particular, it >> would be a reasonable and possibly less controversial alternative to the <| >> symbol. I would have no objection to that switch and have written the >> suggestion up at >> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php#suggestion_to_replace_with >> >> Some examples of this usage of -> include: >> >> MyObject.prototype -> {a:1,b:2} >> appArrayBehavior->[0,1,2,3,4,5] >> let subclass = superclass -> function () {}; >> var p = newRegExpMethods -> /[a-m][3-7]/ >> >> What do you think? Do you like -> better than <| ? Is it ok to not have it >> available for some possible future function shorthand? -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer [email protected] home: rauschma.de twitter: twitter.com/rauschma blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
