(wow I don't know where these stale message came from....please ignore) On Mar 1, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> It was recently suggest to me that it is unlikely that we will ever adopt -> > as as function expression shorthand symbol and that this means we could > consider using that symbol sequence for other purposes. In particular, it > would be a reasonable and possibly less controversial alternative to the <| > symbol. I would have no objection to that switch and have written the > suggestion up at > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php#suggestion_to_replace_with > > Some examples of this usage of -> include: > > MyObject.prototype -> {a:1,b:2} > appArrayBehavior->[0,1,2,3,4,5] > let subclass = superclass -> function () {}; > var p = newRegExpMethods -> /[a-m][3-7]/ > > What do you think? Do you like -> better than <| ? Is it ok to not have it > available for functions? > > Allen > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
