> -1. I would actively avoid using this in my own ES6 code, because of the 
> unnecessary confusion it would cause to those coming from CoffeeScript.

>> Why should ES/JavaScript make its decisions based on a transpiled language 
>> that actually requires JS itself to exist? I don't think it should matter 
>> either way...

Because the overlap between CoffeeScript programmers and JavaScript programmers 
is one of the highest between JavaScript and any other language. And this 
overlap will only increase by the time ES6 makes it out the door.

If you're arguing that CoffeeScript should change itself to accommodate 
JavaScript, well, maybe Jeremy can comment on how likely that is. Personally I 
think es-discuss should be careful not to alienate such a large and growing 
fraction of their userbase, especially with comments like the above that seem, 
on the surface at least, to be belittling the role and importance of 
CoffeeScript. IMO "CoffeeScript 6" will be a very important factor in the 
success of ECMAScript 6, so making it as easy and welcoming as possible is an 
important consideration.

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to