Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
Can we make progress on the class declaration front (important for usability and tool support)? What is the current state with regard to the objections against an Ashkenas-style (or Herman-style) minimal solution (that is: mostly object initializer syntax, prefixed by the keyword `class`)? Unless
From my point, the only big (but really big) problem is the word mostly. If classes would introduce special beast of their own, I will see them as a problem. If they could be built by reusing object-literal syntax, I'd gladly accept them.
the nature of classes will radically change in the future, I don’t see why we can’t start small and enhance in the future.
I would be glad to see some gallery of minimal approaches, with easy diffing showing the same code implemented in them (I would also propose minimal classes of my own). But it is reasonable only when minimal classes in general would be accepted as the way to go.
Herby _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
