Brendan Eich wrote:
I noted to Jeremy that even his classes gist snuck in a novelty or two (the one I remember is class <expr> evaluating <expr> and copying it somehow). We need to avoid novelty, while accepting that doing so is to some extent future-hostile because present-friendly.
Could you please make this clearer, if you can? I do not understand it fully, but what I understood so far (maybe mistakenly), I am afraid of.
You say no brand new idea has chance to get in, since it is not known what it brings in the future? I am kind of person that believes in crazy (read: really different) ideas can push things through... but nevertheless, what did you mean more exactly by this paragraph?
/be
Thanks, Herby _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
