http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:object_literals
As far as I can tell, there are no commas after concise methods.
On Mar 21, 2012, at 18:55 , Brendan Eich wrote:
> Confusion: then why did you leave a comma out (it's required in any proposed
> initialiser syntax) after method's closing brace?
>
> /be
>
> Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
>> No, just that, starting with ES5, you can write a trailing comma (like after
>> `bar`, below). If you combine that with the proposed shorter method syntax
>> for object literals then syntactically, it’s just like replacing each
>> semicolon with a comma, in a hypothetical semicolon-based syntax.
>>
>> With "semicolon separation", I meant "semicolon-based syntax".
>>
>>>> I wonder, though, if comma-separation can’t be learned, especially if
>>>> trailing commas can be added (which is legal in ES5):
>>>>
>>>> let obj = {
>>>> foo: 123,
>>>> method() {
>>>> }
>>>> bar: "abc",
>
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
[email protected]
home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
