I do not believe TC39 agreed to that.
/be
Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:object_literals
As far as I can tell, there are no commas after concise methods.
On Mar 21, 2012, at 18:55 , Brendan Eich wrote:
Confusion: then why did you leave a comma out (it's required in any proposed
initialiser syntax) after method's closing brace?
/be
Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
No, just that, starting with ES5, you can write a trailing comma (like after
`bar`, below). If you combine that with the proposed shorter method syntax for
object literals then syntactically, it’s just like replacing each semicolon
with a comma, in a hypothetical semicolon-based syntax.
With "semicolon separation", I meant "semicolon-based syntax".
I wonder, though, if comma-separation can’t be learned, especially if trailing
commas can be added (which is legal in ES5):
let obj = {
foo: 123,
method() {
}
bar: "abc",
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
