On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Axel Rauschmayer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I like variant B, because it follows the rules:
> - "module" => define a module
> - "import" => extract something out of a module
>
> But I would use a keyword instead of "=" (due to the reason that you
> mentioned). Compare:
>
> module Bar = "bar.js";
> module Bar is "bar.js";
> module Bar from "bar.js";
> module Bar in "bar.js";
> module Bar via "bar.js";
>
> I’m not entirely happy with either one of these keywords, but they all seem
> better to me than the equals sign. So any other keyword is fine by me, really.
equals makes sense when it is assigment:
module Bar = load("bar.js");
jjb
>
> On Mar 22, 2012, at 2:35 , David Herman wrote:
>
>> Follow-up: I've factored out these two alternative approaches, both of which
>> I think are defensible.
>>
>> Grammars:
>>
>> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:modules#syntax
>>
>> Simple examples:
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:modules#external_module_load
>
> --
> Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
> [email protected]
>
> home: rauschma.de
> twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
> blog: 2ality.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
