On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Gavin Barraclough <[email protected]>wrote:
> I really like the direction you're going in, but have one minor concern > relating to regular expressions. > > In your proposal, you currently state: > "A code unit that is in the range 0xD800 to 0xDFFF, but is not part > of a surrogate pair, is interpreted as a code point with the same value." > Just as a reminder, this would be in explicit violation of the Unicode conformance clause C1 unless it can be guaranteed that such a code point will not be interpreted as an abstract character: C1 A process shall not interpret a high-surrogate code point or a low-surrogate code point as an abstract character. [1] http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.1.0/ch03.pdf Given that such guarantee is likely impractical, this presents a problem for the above proposed language.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
