On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Glenn Adams <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think either of these amount to interpretation as abstract >> characters. I mention U+FFFD because the alternative interpretation of >> unpaired surrogates would be to replace them with U+FFFD, but that doesn't >> seem to improve anything. >> > I would call it an improvement since it reduces spread|contamination of|by unpaired surrogate code points. I'm not sure what other advantage would be great enough to trump the desire to prevent such contamination.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
