> > No, in the example Axel showed, the private name is block-scoped and does > not leak. Same goes for a module: you'd need to export the binding. Or so > I've thought -- do you see another way the name could leak? >
No - I just misunderstood Axel's point. IIUC, he's showing how a privately named method can always "travel along" with the methods that require it, by bundling those methods together in a mixin object. kevin
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
