>
> IOW, OOP-uber-alles does not work and is not necessary in JS.
>
Yep - I'm sensing that.
Actually, I'm trying to push the "class" idea to see where it breaks down,
and I think my original point still stands: "methods with private names"
and OOP-style "private methods" are not the same thing.
More to the point: it seems that given the inability of privately named
methods to fully emulate OOP-style privacy, it would seem unlikely that
we'd ever want a "private" method modifier, as in:
private M3() { ... }
It would just be too confusing.
kevin
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
