+1 for simple enough. It's also shorter (12 vs 20) On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote:
> Brendan Eich wrote: > >> This last point is important: we do not want an object's typeof-type to >> change by giving it a @call property. But we do want to enable call and >> construct protocols to be built by users, by giving objects @call and >> @construct properties. >> > > I did not include an Object.isCallable(v) API that returns true if (@call > in v), but we could add that. Testing (@call in v) seems simple enough. > > > /be > ______________________________**_________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
