It seems rather non-intention-revealing. ________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Mark S. Miller [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 17:20 To: Brendan Eich Cc: Tom Van Cutsem; Mark Miller; es-discuss Subject: Re: callable objects ?
+1 for simple enough. It's also shorter (12 vs 20) On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Brendan Eich wrote: This last point is important: we do not want an object's typeof-type to change by giving it a @call property. But we do want to enable call and construct protocols to be built by users, by giving objects @call and @construct properties. I did not include an Object.isCallable(v) API that returns true if (@call in v), but we could add that. Testing (@call in v) seems simple enough. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
