> > I'd prefer if concise method syntax stayed simple syntactic sugar for > functions. Methods obviously need dynamic this. If you combine that > with changes like the above, then you have implicitly introduced a > third kind of function that cannot be described as (simple) syntactic > sugar for any of the other two. That would be unfortunate, IMO. >
FWIW, I agree. kevin
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
