Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
The only case that isn't receiving special syntax (and thus which
could potentially benefit from a dynamic-this thin-arrow function) is
#3. However, while #3 is commontoday, #1 and #2 will eat most of its
share. I'm not sure that the remaining #3 cases will be worth a
special syntax.
If they are, though, nothing's closing the door on a thin-arrow in the
future. No reason to block fat-arrow based on this.
Nicely put and I agree -- but I'm open to "the future" being sooner than
we think. Getting => past TC39 took some doing, don't want to break
consensus over pushing ->. Do want to get to -> if the use-cases from
the field are strong enough.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
