> I believe that we could grammatically use ArrowBody as the body of concise
> methods in object literals and classes. In that case, Dave's example could
> be expressed as:
>
> box = {
> _value: 0,
> unbox() ()-> this._value,
> setbox(v) this._value = v
> }
That would be very nice. And it would be a perfect solution for the completion
value issue: If you want to implicitly return the completion value, use an
expression body.
Is there a typo in the code? I’d expect it to be:
box = {
_value: 0,
unbox() this._value,
setbox(v) this._value = v
}
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
[email protected]
home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
