On 8 June 2012 04:28, David Herman <[email protected]> wrote: > - You mentioned that compatibility requires error.stack to be a string, > even though programs would really like to have a structured version. Should > we offer a different property with structured stack frame info (probably > with a getter to allow straight-forward lazy construction), called > error.stackFrames or error.stackEntries or something? >
Big +1 on that. Avoiding parsing information the engine has as discrete items already is a Good Thing(tm). Perhaps it'll be aspirational at first, but if specified now it'll happen eventually. -- T.J.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
