On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:57 PM, T.J. Crowder <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8 June 2012 04:28, David Herman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> - You mentioned that compatibility requires error.stack to be a string, >> even though programs would really like to have a structured version. Should >> we offer a different property with structured stack frame info (probably >> with a getter to allow straight-forward lazy construction), called >> error.stackFrames or error.stackEntries or something? > > > Big +1 on that. Avoiding parsing information the engine has as discrete > items already is a Good Thing(tm). Perhaps it'll be aspirational at first, > but if specified now it'll happen eventually.
There has been some interest in trying to align the existing Error stack property and this proposal is about that. Could we provide a new better alternative API? Of course. Feel free to come up with another proposal. -- erik _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
