T.J. Crowder wrote:
On 12 June 2012 18:00, Brendan Eich <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
T.J. Crowder wrote:
And yet, if not yet implemented in its current form (I have no
idea what the extent of implementation is), the complexity
increment does not seem large.
Here you went down the bad path.
It was not the last cookie I ate that made me fat. Every little
"wafer-thin" (cf. MPTMoL) increment hurts. Every single one.
As Felix points out, the algorithm isn't exactly complicated.
More bad-path words, ignore the little horned red guy on your
shoulder.
This sort of argument can almost _always_ be applied. Again, not
saying I really endorse the embedded varargs, but I don't think this
is a persuasive argument against _on its own_.
You are correct!
The context matters. In that context, your argument that "the complexity
increment does not seem large" is also not a persuasive argument *for*
adding that increment, and I call it worse: a sign (in context of rest
as drafted for ES6) that you're going too far.
Red guy still on your shoulder :-P.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
